Wednesday 29 October 2014

DISABILITY RIGHTS WATCH PROPOSES AMBASSADORIAL AWARD IN HONOUR OF PRESIDENT SATA

We receive the death of our President Mr. Michael Chilufya Sata with great pain and misbelieve. Persons with disabilities will remember the late President for his courage and boldness in dealing with work and development related issues. The President struggled for all Zambians while exhibiting a sense of both humour and seriousness at the same time.

The first thing President Sata did for persons with disabilities when he came into power was to quickly enact the Persons with Disabilities Act of 2012. The Act domesticates the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The government struggled on to develop a National Disability Policy and its Implementation Plan. Government has also developed the National Disability Mainstreaming Plan. All this was under the able hand of Mr. Sata.
For the first time, after close to ten years, the Zambia Agency for Persons with Disabilities received an 80% increase from government in the 2014 budget. In most of his commitments Michael Sata never forgot persons with disabilities.

It is in view of the above that Zambia will be receiving an Ambassadorial Country Award from the Secretariat of the African Decade on Disability, now called the African Disability Alliance (ADA). The Award will be handed over to government on 3rd December, 2014. 3rd December is the International Day for Persons with Disabilities. Mr. Sata was to receive the Award on behalf of the Zambians. Today he is gone.
We strongly propose that the Award be a dedication to him. It should be called the “Michael Sata Ambassadorial Award to Zambia”.

May His Soul Rest In Peace

Tuesday 14 October 2014

CHALLENGING THE EXERCISE OF LEGAL CAPACITY IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS



OUR partners The Mental Health Users Network of Zambia MHUNZA have produced a useful and insightful report on the exercise of legal capacity for persons with mental disabilities. They contend that the current legal framework governing the electoral process in Zambia is discriminatory.
The findings of the legal analysis will be made public at a dissemination meeting to be held in Lusaka with the attendance of leading civil society actors on Friday 17th October, 2014.
If the law is explicitly discriminating, why should society not discriminate. The political systems use these laws to establish and mage themselves. In doing so, again, persons with mental disabilities are negatively affected.
 It is of our view that the laws have got discrepancies. If the Constitution and the Electoral Act equate a person “of unsound mind” to a Person with a Disability, then the law contradicts the Persons with Disabilities Act because the Act of 2012 clearly promotes the rights of persons with mental disabilities.
 We shall publish the full report here at the end of the week. 

Tuesday 7 October 2014

DRW embarks on Strategic Advocacy Capacity Building for Zambian DPOs

The Disability Rights Watch has embarked on a programme to build the capacity of Disabled Persons Organisations DPOs in strategic advocacy and interpretation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The first training of trainers was convened in Lusaka from 3-4 October 2014 and had board members and programme managers of DPOs supported by Opportunity Zambia in attendance. The organisations that attended this training are Mental Health Users Network of Zambia, Zambia Association for Parents of Children with Disabilities, The Zambia Association of Employment of Parents of Children with Disabilities and the Archie Hinchcliff Disability Intervention.

Here below is one key presentation made by DRW President Waliuya Wamundila at the training:

  
DISABILITY RIGHTS WATCH

Facipulation

Facipulation! This sounds to be a completely new word. It seems to be combination of two words. These words are ‘facilitation’ and ‘manipulation’. In simple terms it means facilitating while manipulating. A trainer may facilitate a workshop while manipulating the learning process. In many circumstances, people treat the word manipulation negatively. It apparently means twisting information or forcing change on people. We have heard of political manipulation. So, it is important to ensure that we as facilitators of training sessions remove this negative connotation. When people say they have been manipulated they geel abused or badly treated and cheated. In life we need to manipulate something in order to resolve certain situations.

For instance, a physiotherapist need to manipulate some muscles in some ailing parts of the body in order to remove pain or strengthen the muscles. This is good manipulation. During the process of facilitating learning in a workshop, manipulation is used positively. The learning process is positively manipulated to re-enforce particular thinking. This form of manipulating is more of mental than the physical one done by the physiotherapist.

Some scholars have indicated that most facilitators of personal or organisational development would not like to be described as manipulative. They’d describe their “facilitation” as a process of helping people to help themselves, to reach a goal, to identify a path and indeed to achieve something either set out clearly at the start, or discovered along the way. Facilitators make the path easier, they help people get to where they want to go, or to identify the want in the first place. Some facilitators will be more convergent in style working with a clearly laid out target, goal, and even route to get there. Others will be emergent. They allow the learning to shape itself as they go along.
A physiotherapist is a manipulator. Due to trust from their clients, they are allowed to manipulate for the purpose of good. The client will not treat this as manipulation. In facilitating learning, the facilitator goes into the same relationship. When necessary, they will have to manipulate the process in order to achieve their learning goal.
In my training experience, I have done a lot of manipulation in order to shift the thinking of people. My experience is in facilitation learning workshops for persons with different disabilities including children. Just imagine facilitating a workshop with all categories of disabilities, including those with intellectual disabilities. It takes mental manipulation to achieve your goal. A facilitator should be able to change methodologies to fit the prevailing situation without the participants knowing what is happening. Participants move with the facilitator because they trust his/her skills. Good manipulators tend to be good facilitators. So, they are good facipulators.

Just imagine you are facilitating a workshop for participants who feel they are more skilled than you in facilitating. The based is to manipulate them positively. Use new manipulating methodologies they may not experienced. Most facilitators like group work for their workshops. Well! It is good but add more flavor to it. When training persons with disabilities, most especially children, a facilitator simply needs to be a manipulator. In certain circumstances individualized manipulation is necessary to enhance the learning process.

We can now see what facipulation is. It is manipulative facilitation of a learning process with the aim of achieving the goal the facilitator has set to achieve. In many circumstances, the participants do not even realise that they are being manipulated. The facilitator asks the participants to get to do things he has planned to have them do. In facipulation, it is assumed that the participants have allowed the facilitator to help them to a better level in terms of learning or development. There is existing trust.

There are some situations in which facipulation tends to be negative in a workshop. Some of the circumstances are as follows:

*      When the facilitator is in a conflict of interest with those who have hired him/her or with the rest of the participants. This comes when the facilitator has interest in the agenda of the organisation he/she is hired to work for.

*      When the facilitator is not confident enough to manipulate emerging circumstances. The facilitator pre-determines the games, group work and other methods and fails to adapt when things change. They tend to manipulate the workshop to fit into their plans.

*      When the facilitator wants to manipulate the workshop to meet their needs rather than those of the participants. Some scholars say that people who are formerly pure managers of faculty consultants always tend to be rigid and conduct the sessions like a choir.

*      When the facilitator is insecure and keeps a distance from the participants.

*      When the facilitator is naturally a manipulator and bully in their life. They usually tend to push around people and so they will do it with the participants.

*      When the facilitator does not know the area/topic very well. They may have been assigned to facilitate on behalf on another person or use rot memory. The workshop becomes very mechanical. They may use power point from beginning to end. They may fail to take questions so they manipulate the process to themselves.

The above circumstances should never happen at all. But they happen!

Facipulation is above asking the right questions at the right time. It is about helping the participants get to where they desire to be in terms of learning and experience. The facilitator coordinates the learning process. Facipulation is an art. It is a delicate blend of facilitation in which there is catalyzing, easing and supporting conversations and actions around issues important to the participants.
At the same time, facipulation involves manipulation in which there is steering conversations by participants towards their established themes and goals, and ensuring that actions and decisions made by the participants support their interests. It should not be towards the interests of the facilitator.
When planning a workshop ensure that you study the list of participants and check whether there are some whom you know are difficult. Make specific plans for them to be easily manipulated. Prepare good snacks, T-shirts, pens, notebooks and make all the participants feel at home and want to be invited to another workshop in future.

Assign people to groups ahead of time, and plant someone who knows exactly what you want to achieve in each group. Talk to those whom you have planted and tell them that you have chosen them to assist you facilitate the process. Never put the difficult people in the same group. Engeneer the group work questions in such a way that you get what you want. Never give enough time for the groups to complete their work. They may never complete.

Call for feedback and ask the participants on how they want to do their presentations. Allow one group at a time. Allow questions and comments. Do not comment a lot. After they have presented tell them what you exactly expected them to present. Lead them to agree with you.

Wamundila Waliuya.

October, 2014.

KILLING OF A PERSON WITH A MENTAL DISABILITY IN MONGU

Our partners the Mental Health Users Network of Zambia has issued this important statement:


October 6, 2014

PRESS STATEMENT

For Immediate Release

RE: THE KILLING OF A MENTAL HEALTH USER IN MONGU

The Mental Health Users Network of Zambia MHUNZA is concerned at the reported death of a person with a mental disability at the hands of another mental health user in a public mental health unit in Mongu, Western Province of Zambia.

MHUNZA is appealing to the relevant authorities to thoroughly and quickly investigate this issue to ascertain the circumstances under which the death occurred.

The killing of a mental health patient by another patient whilst in a government run health institution is a stark reminder of how badly persons with mental disabilities are neglected in our country. It is even more saddening that this incident has happened at a time when we join the rest of the world in commemorating World Mental Health Day on the 10th October, 2014.

We would love to convey our heartfelt condolences to the family of the deceased. We know how it feels to lose a loved one. This is the reason why MHUNZA is lobbying for the new Mental Health Bill to be passed in Parliament to repeal the current archaic Mental Health Act of 1951.

It is regrettable that a life was lost because of lack of care and inadequate human resource to provide mental health services in the public health system. What happened in Mongu is a violation of the rights and inherent dignity of persons with mental health disabilities and is only a tip of the iceberg in as far as the challenge of mental health management is concerned in Zambia. We must all work together to put an end to this.

A few weeks ago MHUNZA working with the Ministry of Health and the Mental Disability Advocacy Centre launched a report of a human rights investigation done on mental health facilities and services in Zambia. The report documents the challenges that confront the management of mental health services in Zambia which results in incidents like these. The report reveals the degrading conditions and treatment that persons with mental health issues face in Zambia. We appeal to government to upgrade all mental health facilities and support community based rehabilitation services.

Zambia is a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities UNCRPD which provides for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disabilities. It is therefore important that in line with international standards Zambia should ensure the availability of community based support services and mental health services at primary level with adequate and trained mental health personnel.

Issued by:

Mulima Kasote

Acting National Coordinator

Phone: +260975403524